I'd mentioned before how Trek likes to explore different storytelling techniques. And in 'Court Martial,' we have a courtroom drama set in the world of the Federation. Here Kirk is put on trial for negligence of duty when crewman dies during a crisis.
"How can anyone who looks this good be guilty of anything? I mean, seriously!" — James Kirk |
If this episode is any indication, the Judge Advocate General's office is really, really messed up. I will call a lot of shenanigans on space law in a bit, but first I want to share something.
I have a theory on Captain James Tiberius Kirk. I don't really expect anyone to subscribe to its lunacy, but it helps me make sense of the character. I don't think he believes he's ready for command. I believe his arrogance and overconfidence is a mask for his insecurities. He understands the weight of the responsibilities of his position. He understands that he holds the lives of hundred under his direct command, and that it's his moral compass that must guide his decisions that may affect the lives of the countless billions within the Federation. At this time, Starfleet is still exploring the quadrant. They've met countless enemies and godlike beings so advanced as to appear magical. And Kirk has faced them all with a wink and a nod and not a shred of doubt in what he's doing is right.
That doesn't mean I don't think he's ready for the job. He is. He's clearly smart, capable, decisive, talented, eloquent, and more than willing to throw a haymaker when necessary. But I think his unwavering bravado is a facade to mask his self-doubt. It's his first command. He's in uncharted territories both physically and emotionally for him. Why do I believe that? Well, I'm glad you asked.
Kirk is presented as a paragon, the best of what humanity has to offer. But I cannot accept that Kirk truly believes himself to be that man. The counter-argument to that, is that Kirk is a human being. I choose to believe that it's all an act. That he's choosing to put on this larger-than-life persona as a means to deal with his responsibility. He has to charge forth into the vast unknown and face it with out a moment's hesitation. He always has to be right. Not because of his ego, but because it's what's demanded of him in his position as captain of the Enterprise.
Otherwise, he's a completely arrogant, irredeemable asshole, and not a flawed man doing the best he can in fantastic circumstances, under extraordinary pressure, and the responsibility of the most advanced military weapon mankind has yet to build. I choose to believe that Kirk is far more complex that the aforementioned paragon of humanity. Because, if this isn't the case, he's boring. And I cannot stand being bored.
In 'Court Martial,' when Kirk is accused of his crime, negligence of duty, Kirk just can't process it. He stands firm on his story, the ship was on red alert during an ion storm, and he had to make the tough call of jettisoning a crewman in order to save the ship. The man, Finney, Kirk supposedly killed was someone with whom he'd had a history. Kirk, as a junior officer, derailed this man's career, and wound up commanding the Enterprise instead. With their former friendship dissolved, Kirk is accused of deliberately murdering the man for... Eh, the logic of it doesn't really track, so I'm going to stop while I'm ahead here instead of trying to explain it. The computer records counter his story, and computer records are never, ever wrong.
|
When Spock and McCoy are called to the stand to testify, both hold Kirk up to that paragon standard to which they hold him. Spock believes the computer to be in error solely because it is illogical for Kirk to have make a mistake. McCoy testifies that Kirk is so far removed from human psychology that the animosity Finney had for Kirk would have no effect on his decision making. The Commodore who puts Kirk on trial opens the story with how one-in-a-million special starship captains are, and how Kirk is the best of the best of them. Even Finney's daughter, who screamed bloody murder at the site of Kirk earlier in the episode comes to understand that Kirk is just... that... damned... awesome at being better than everyone else.
Here's where I shift gears a bit and call space shenanigans on the Starfleet legal system. First, the prosecution in the case, Lt. Shaw, is an ex-lover of Kirks. While it adds dramatic tension, it's clearly a conflict of interest and she should have immediately recused herself from the case. Secondly, his attorney is a straight-up crackpot. An eccentric that believes that computers are terrible and that books are the way to go. Because you can't read the original law from a computer. Which, from a 21st century viewing perspective is just batshit insane. Kirk is amused by the man's eccentricity, but should have instead immediately asked for someone not crazy. What's more is that this eccentricity never pays off. They don't come to a conclusion that proves old-fashioned book learnin' is better than computerized, digitized information. Instead, they wind up using a computer to solve their problem. Thereby derailing the attorney's eccentricity into a futile anti-technology rant.
"But I like books, they're my only friends." — Crackpot Lawyer Person |
Kirk's bravado and reckless ego are validated by all of this. The crew's assessment of him as the paragon are reset and all's right with the Enterprise once again. His actions are justified, and he's been shown to be able to do no wrong.
But he's once again proven he's the right man for the most dangerous job in the quadrant.
--
Next up, things in space go boom in the two-part DS9 epic, with Favor the Bold & Sacrifice of Angels.
No comments:
Post a Comment